On-time delivery
Completed deliveries meeting the agreed promise / eligible completed deliveries. Revised promises, failed attempts and partial deliveries need written rules.
Industry solution · Written delivery
Delivery reliability, workload and operating-cost visibility from existing dispatch and service records.
Check My Data — FreeBusiness areas for this industry
These are applicable areas to consider. Your agreed question and available data determine which ones are included in a project.
Need a different combination? Custom Analytics can be scoped around your requirements.
Operational decisions
More completed jobs do not necessarily mean more reliable service. We distinguish throughput, on-time completion and outstanding work, with an agreed definition of what counts as a delivery and when it is considered complete.
Useful sources include dispatch exports, promised delivery times, completion records and job identifiers. Before reporting an on-time rate, we confirm exclusions such as cancellations and whether customer-agreed rescheduling changes the promised date.
The operating preview illustrates throughput and on-time completion. Its synthetic delivery totals demonstrate the reporting structure; they are not performance claims for a logistics operator.
Completed deliveries meeting the agreed promise / eligible completed deliveries. Revised promises, failed attempts and partial deliveries need written rules.
Open jobs, age bands and completion patterns by depot or service. Consistent status history is needed to distinguish delay from normal work in progress.
Agreed costs by job, route or period when allocation data exists. Revenue or distance alone cannot establish route profitability.
Interpretation and limits
A headline service rate is more useful when it is accompanied by the records behind it. Late jobs can be grouped by service, location or delay band, while the written observations make data gaps and ambiguous statuses explicit.
Cost reporting may require rules for fuel, subcontractors, labour and shared overhead. Those allocations are business decisions that must be confirmed before a route margin is presented as comparable.
If distance or utilisation is needed, appropriate movement and capacity records are required. We do not infer vehicle utilisation from invoice totals. A first project can instead focus on delivery reliability from the data already available.
For the Fit Check, describe the columns, approximate volume and time period. Do not send production credentials or personal records.
Choose one decision, one reporting period and an agreed set of sources. Receive the scoped dashboard, written observations, source assumptions and a documented handover.
The Fit Check identifies whether the data is suitable and recommends a fixed next step. Project price, exclusions, delivery environment and timing are confirmed in writing before work begins.
View the existing fixed-price packagesIt may support throughput and reliability if promise and completion fields are present. Cost or utilisation questions need additional sources.
Yes, after timezone, cutoff and business-day rules are agreed. Comparing raw timestamps without that context can misclassify deliveries.
Example project scope
Define the eligible deliveries, reporting cutoff and promised-time rule. The report can then separate completed work from open jobs and show the records behind a service-rate exception.
A management view can combine accepted workload and financial measures after their sources have been reconciled. This executive illustration uses a separate synthetic operating dataset and is not a transport-cost benchmark.
The final scope specifies the question, accepted sources, excluded calculations and the output to be delivered. Any additional view is an agreed extension rather than an implied inclusion in every package.
Start with your question and a description of your data. We confirm data fit and scope in writing.